My Sentencing 10/30/2010 (Part Two)

 [Continued from My Sentencing 10/30/2010 (Part One). I am back working through my pretrial detention journal. It is out of order. Well, the order is as I have opened boxes. The date in the title is the date it was written. I hope this is not confusing. You can find everything from my pretrial detention journal that is published under the “Pretrial Detention” link under topics on the right hand of your screen.… Even more confusing, this seems to have been sent to KH, and I wrote another piece on my sentencing. The original, handwritten notes are 8 pages long. I am splitting this piece in two, and will publish the latter, second piece directly after this. In these entries, I am rather blunt about my crimes; the squeamish may want to go read something else. One last thing, I have edited some words because I found after I got my monitoring software that certain words blocked access to my blog; these have been altered. My sentencing hearing was 10/29/2010. What you are reading is what you get for your tax dollars. sch 11/09/2025]

I expect my only complaint with the court to be a complaint for many months. The court thought my sentence would deter others. It might if anyone in the chatrooms ever were to know about it. You know about the tree falling in the forest and no one there to hear it. Just as the cops could think they had earned their pay, so with the judge. He could think by saying my sentence could deter others that others would be deterred.

 I wish the judge were correct. If I am to be used as an example, then I wish to be used properly. I have written that often enough since I began writing these pieces, and my thinking remains the same. More on this in a moment.

I never got to say anything in rebuttal to the police officer. I already looked bad and dangerous, and I think my lawyer feared me also appearing mad. 

If you read what else I write here, and what I have written here, you will know more about me than did the court.  Too not judge the judge too harshly, he did the best he could with a moral leper.

If you are playing with illegal images online, you need to know this:

1. If caught, you will be looking at 10–20 years in federal prison.
2. The more pictures you have, the worse things will be - get rid of all of them now.
3. Whatever you say online will be used against you as being the real you.

If you want to stop illegal images, then do the following:

1. Post a link to this article in the adult chatrooms, and every other adult chatroom known to you. People there do not know how much trouble they could get into. I say scaring them with reality will get rid of the dilettantes and maybe some of the others. Maybe, then, my 151 months will have a deterrent effect.
2. Go into the Yahoo adult chat rooms and flame the one with obviously dangerous names. Give them no place to stay.
3. Likewise, report those names to Yahoo (and whatever other chatrooms you know of).

If I am to be an example, then use me. I can then, also, do something the federal sentencing guidelines give no opportunity for me to do: make atonement. Judge McKinney was correct in saying what I did could lead to harm to another. This, I never intended. Anyone reading all that will appear shall know that. But intending no harm does not also mean not correcting the harm caused, and that's atonement. I apologize beforehand for making the request, but I cannot act myself, and 2022 is too late to start. Please help get the word into the adult chatrooms.

At some point, I hope someone can afford to obtain my sentencing hearing transcript so it can also be posted online and its link to be pushed through the adult chatrooms. This is the way to effectively fight illegal images on the internet.

sch

[2025 talking to 2010. No one published either part of this note. It just did not happen. I am not even sure it was read. Too much raw pain was inflicted in me, and stuff like this only made it worse. So, 2022 did not come too late. Whether 2025 is too late is a question you need to answer. I believe in what I was written in 2010 - the government claimed deterrent effect without actually acting to effectuate that deterrence. That annoys me still - being used as a deterrent with without any intent to do so feels like I cooperated in a fraud perpetuated by the government. Do what you can. Thank you. sch 11/10/2025.]