Friday, September 4, 2026

Wendell Berry, Great American Writer

 I read Wendell Berry while in prison, and he impressed me. Another American writer who needs more attention.

Wendell Berry, Son of Kentucky (Jake Meador, The Dispatch): 

But, as retired Princeton religion scholar Jeffrey Stout has observed, all of the themes that preoccupied Nietzsche—including the death of God and the slow absorption of the great into an undifferentiated herd—were first concerns of the quintessential American democrat, Ralph Waldo Emerson. No one was more attuned than Emerson to the ways in which a mindless conformity can eat away at the soul and slowly erode the life of a community. His many essays and lectures were written not to promote an atomized individualism, as some critics have claimed, but rather to call his readers to a fidelity to what he saw as true, living religion that rose above the herd. In other words, the problems identified by our emerging nihilist class of commentators were not first discovered by anti-liberals like Nietzsche, but were well known to committed democrats like Emerson.

But Emerson saw a way of overcoming all of this from within a democratic frame. The “democracy” that stultified common life was but a semblance of democracy, a corrupt mockery of the real thing. The true democrat, for Emerson, was the man who followed the truth where it led without regard for the demands put upon him by society or by false authorities who wore, as one writer very much in the Emersonian tradition put it, “the mantle of power but not of knowledge.”

That writer, of course, is the late Mr. Wendell Berry of Port Royal, Kentucky, son of John Marshall Berry and Virginia Berry, who died earlier this week at age 92. These older conventions of obituary writing, naming the deceased’s home place and the names of his people, seem utterly nonnegotiable in any account of Mr. Berry’s life. 

Among the several things that helped turn my life around and gave me the means of putting together the shards of myself, it was Thoreau. The above essay ties Berry with Thoreau and that now makes sense to me and gives depth to Wendell Berry’s Nine Rules by Ted Gioia.

Gioia's essay provoked this response from my friend KH:

It is an age of specialization. I used to be able to work on my car, now I can’t. OTOH, they’re much safer, fewer people are killed in them and they’re spaceships compared with 25 years ago. 
We used to think pagers were amazing. Now we have a computer in our hands. 
I’m concerned with Big Tech but that’s a failure of government to regulate. Standard Oil and the railroads were once big tech. Then came TR. 
If you want to move to a farm in Kentucky and live off the land, you can probably eschew all of this. The rest of us have to live in 2026. 

Nick Offerman on the Essential Wisdom of Wendell Berry (Literary Hub)

   sch 9/3

 

A Small Man's Delusions Diminish Us All

Is America Now an Imperial Populist Oligarchy? - Paul D. Miller (The Dispatch) had to be written long before Trump told us the Department of Defense was buying into Venezuelan oil. It does not undercut the essay.

Remarkable US oil deal puzzles analysts - and angers many Venezuelans (BBC)

The Nobel Peace Prize winner and presidential hopeful, María Corina Machado, may choose not to publicly criticise President Trump, whose support she needs if she hopes to come to power. Others, though, have been more forthcoming.

"You chose to use the power of the United States not to liberate Venezuelans, but to ally yourself with our oppressors," said Venezuelan economist, Ricardo Hausmann, on social media, directing his comments at the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

"You opted to push through an asset seizure, an unconstitutional agreement with an illegitimate and oppressive government, instead of using the leadership of the United States to first restore constitutional order and democracy," he said.

The lack of an imminent election in Venezuela – or, indeed, any clear plan towards one – strikes many opponents as a betrayal.

Democrats concerned over Trump's massive Venezuelan oil deal 

Untested in court, Trump's new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions 

Pentagon Erupts Over Report on Classified Warnings Against Iran War (The New Republic).


 

How Trump Uses Dormant Laws to Amass Power  (The New Republic) both scares me and makes me pause at the efforts made by the Administration's lawyers to find obscure laws to bend to their purposes.

 The Trump administration’s enthusiasm for reviving moribund laws to accomplish its policy goals should inspire Congress to consider repealing or revising them. Trump and his allies have inflicted plenty of harm by violating federal laws during his second term. Another important problem is when he abuses and misuses existing laws. If Congress is interested in restoring its own primacy in our constitutional order, it should reconsider its own past missteps, as well.

Both of the court revivals illustrate the problem. While federal law authorizes the use of prize courts, they have not meaningfully existed since the Civil War. The Union Navy blockaded Southern ports throughout the war and seized military and civilian vessels alike. Once captured, the ships were typically brought to Union-held ports for disposal by prize courts. In 1863, the Supreme Court rejected legal challenges to the Southern blockade and upheld President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to seize and sell ships and goods acquired from it.

As Bloomberg noted when it reported on the prize courts’ revival earlier this week, the courts fell into disuse after the Spanish-American War ended in 1900 and were moribund after World War II. They reflect a nineteenth-century understanding of naval warfare where both a nation’s navy and private citizens acting as privateers could capture vessels on the high seas. The changing nature of naval warfare helped render these tactics obsolete: The average American boat owner these days would have an easier time sailing to the moon than capturing an armed enemy warship.

A Congressional Research Service report in 2024 noted that Congress abolished prize money for private citizens in 1899, and any proceeds from prize court cases now go into the Treasury’s general fund instead. The Trump administration’s plans, though still vague, appear to be centered on creating a faster, easier legal pathway to sell captured Iranian oil. This may be riskier for the administration than it looks, since it will give federal courts an opportunity to directly consider whether the ships and goods were lawfully seized. As Lincoln’s own experience showed, such cases can allow judges to consider legality of the war itself. The sixteenth president prevailed; the forty-seventh might not.

 Mark Carney: Why I Rejected Trump’s Trade Deal (The Walrus) left me thinking Carney is doing more to save us from MAGA stupidity than American voters.

We’ve been under no illusions. We recognized, from the start, that America has changed. Early last year, I observed that the decades-long process of steadily increasing integration between our economies was over. Our government understood before many that America would transform all of its commercial relationships, that it would put a series of tariffs on its closest allies, and use economic integration as a weapon. We recognize that sometimes its signature was written in pencil.  

Why do we have a President who has no respect for free speech? Trump vows to report NBC's Kristen Welker to the FCC over endorsement record report. Even more urgent, how did we let a man with such thin skin and gross self-regard into the Presidency?

Trump wrecked everything he ever touched; now he is doing to America's economy what he did to our standing in the world.

Convulsion in credit markets (Kitco News)

 


 No single solution exists for the mess we have created. There will be work, and there is no gain without pain.


 sch 9/2

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Belated Tim Curry Post

 Like everyone else, I first met Tim Curry in The Rocky Horror Picture Show. He was also the reason to watch Times SquareCongo and Earth Two. He almost salvaged The Three Musketeers. Here are the items I collected for this post from last week.

‘He could arch both eyebrows and curl his lips in every direction all at once’: Tim Curry’s five best screen roles (The Guardian)

The Rocky Horror Picture Show review – the campfest that became a cultural colossus | Movies (The Guardian)

Tim Curry (The Guardian) 

Tim Curry, 1946–2026 - by Sonny Bunch (The Bulwark)

An Ode to the Gleeful Terror of Tim Curry’s Pennywise (Literary Hub)


 

Back in the day, I picked up his albums on the advice of Sheila Brown. I did not see these mentioned in his obits.

 


 


 


 And what might have come close to a hit for him:


 sch 9/2

Indiana The Cost of Living, Religion & Politics, Reliable News Sources, A Clueless General Assembly

Why do we put up with how the Republicans run this state? Ask Sheila Kennedy wrote, time for a change. Before they sell us off entirely.

Mapped: The Cost of Living in Every U.S. State (2026) makes me wonder why it is so cheap to live in Indiana that everybody seems to be having a hard time making a living.

The hardest-working states in the US, ranked 

CONTESTED HISTORY: League of Women Voters’ event examined meaning behind ‘separation of church and state’ (THE INDIANA CITIZEN) embarrasses me because I had no idea it was happening in Muncie. People are not buying Christian nationalism, and the least interested seem to be Christians.

Is Indy news biased? Here’s my advice for finding reliable sources (Indiana Capital Chronicle )

Indiana asked about new SNAP rule. Here’s what people said. (Free Press Indiana).

Indiana’s abortion ban has ‘chilling effect’ in the ER. 

Doing Business (Sheila Kennedy)

A legislature at war with education sends a signal to potential employers that they will have trouble finding a skilled workforce. Siphoning money from public schools that teach accurate science and introduce children to the diversity they will encounter in the workforce in order to fund religious academies is one bad sign; waging war against once-storied public universities by insisting that vetted scholarship is really “liberal indoctrination” ensures that intellectually curious students will either depart Indiana upon graduation or avoid the state entirely and enroll elsewhere.

A legislature that ignores both medical science and women’s rights by banning abortion (and effectively criminalizing medical assistance for emergency pregnancies) sends a message to doctors and women considering employment in the state. In the wake of that travesty, even companies that are already located here are finding it difficult to recruit workers–male or female–from families still in their childbearing years.


Flooding devastated swathes of Indiana but response is hampered by politics  (The Guardian) 

 sch 9/2

 

Tuesday, September 1, 2026

State Constitutional Law

 Excuse the raw data dump. These are articles and cases that I have been reading lately for my research project on state constitutional law. I need to clear out my tabs!

SOME THOUGHTS ON BLACKSTONE, PRECEDENT, AND ORIGINALISM 19VtLRev5.pdf 

McKinster v. Sager, 163 Ind. 671 (Ind. 1904) | HallApproved.com

State v. Gerhardt, 145 Ind. 439 (Ind. 1896) | HallApproved.com

State ex rel. Sonneborn v. Sylvester, 26 Wis. 2d 43 - Wis: Supreme Court 1965 - Google Scholar

Terry Carpenter, Inc. v. Wood, 129 NW 2d 475 - Neb: Supreme Court 1964 - Google Scholar

Rudeen v. Cenarrusa, 38 P. 3d 598 - Idaho: Supreme Court 2001 - Google Scholar

Maine Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. BOARD OF COM'RS, 245 A. 2d 271 - Me: Supreme Judicial Court 1968 - Google Scholar

The Legacy of Slaughterhouse, Bradwell, and Cruikshank in Constitutional Interpretation - The Legacy of Slaughterhouse Bradwell and Cruikshank.pdf

Sears v. Board of Commissioners, 36 Ind. 267 (Ind. 1871) | HallApproved.com

Collins v. Day, 644 NE 2d 72 - Ind: Supreme Court 1994 - Google Scholar

Privileges and Immunities Clause - Wikipedia

REHABILITATING THE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES          

State v. Gibson, 36 Ind. 389 (Ind. 1871) | HallApproved.com

Indiana Constitution (as amended 2024).pdf  

Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. Whiteneck, 8 Ind. 217 (Ind. 1856) | HallApproved.com

State v. Labine, 733 NW 2d 265 - SD: Supreme Court 2007 - Google Scholar

Bailey v. Jones, 139 NW 2d 385 - SD: Supreme Court 1966 - Google Scholar

Article 6, § 1 of the South Dakota Constitution - Inherent rights. :: South Dakota Constitution :: Justia

NATURAL LAW IN AMERICAN COURTS: FROM THE CIVIL WAR’S END TO THE PRESENT 49.Helmholz.pdf     

Infringed 

Sanders v. State Personnel Com'n, 677 SE 2d 182 - NC: Court of Appeals 2009 - Google Scholar 

sch

Saturday, August 29, 2026

More rejections

 Saturday, where did you go?

I got a bit walking in, but missed the bus twice so gave up on a trip to Payless.

Worked on the research project.

Went  to the convenience store in the afternoon and met a dog named Tex.

 Got tired after eating a pizza from Domino's and slept from 6 to a little after 8 PM.

Wrote this post. 

After Making Landfall rejected: 

Thank you again for submitting your work to The Ex-Puritan.

As editors, we’re forced to select an extremely small number of works from the hundreds of great submissions we receive each quarter. Submissions for this issue were once again excellent, and numerous. Although we have to pass on your submission this time around, we’re truly grateful that you thought to send it our way. 

All the best in your future writing. Warm wishes and good luck!


Sincerely,


The Ex-Puritan Editorial Staff

Agnes:

Samuel, thank you for sending us your work. We appreciate the chance to read it, but it's not right for us at this time.

Keep writing. Keep reading. Keep being awesome. And best of luck placing this elsewhere.

We kindly ask that you wait one month before submitting again, regardless of which genre/category you submitted. Submissions that do not follow this guideline will be replied to unread. 

Sincerely,

The Editors

trampset 

sch

 

 

Friday, August 28, 2026

A Week of Best Laid Plans Going A-Gley: Rejections, PO Visits, An Honorable Mention

 I meant to go to this morning's liturgy, only I woke feeling nauseous and then slept late. That is pretty much the story of this week.

 Monday ended with a lot of pain, the surgery seems mostly past, but some side effects remain. I can walk a little faster, except for the limp on my right. Tuesday continued with the pain being apparent. Wednesday, I got out to the writer's group and Walmart; afterward all I wanted to do was sleep. Yesterday, I was up early and my back locked up.

All I have done is work on my research project. I did not have any energy for anything creative.

The PO visited yesterday. The new one and the old one. This is the second time they came as a pair. The old one id his usual glare and glower, stayed silent, and left the same old impression of someone needing antacids. Of course, they came when I had been trying to sleep and was neither awake or asleep. I do not understand being questioned about the monitoring software; it runs in the background and I ignore it. The new guy confused me when he asked about the upcoming polygraph; that is in January. Either he forgot that or just did not know. I feel that I let them down: there has never been any contact with minors, and this year since I rarely leave the apartment, I am not sure how it is expected for me to have some. He asked about an email to Paul S without knowing that I am free to contact felons, so long as we are not engaged in criminal activities. As usual, it was like a visit from aliens. It seems the government expects some sort of maniacal behavior breaking through rather than I am living the life I want to live. They have assumed much about me, have neither questioned their assumptions, and their assumptions are not relevant to how I live my life. The government thinks their court order must chafe me when it is irrelevant. I guess no one understands that the supervised order does not me restricts my life. Oh well, everybody needs to make a buck. It keeps people with no discernible job skills employed.

But getting my nap interrupted did annoy me. 

More importantly, I received an email that I got an Honorable Mention in the William Faulkner Literary Competition for my short story, The First Day of Feeling Free! I cannot attend the award ceremony; I worry about my bowels between here and the convenience store, let alone a trip to Mississippi. It has been a good year for publishing my stuff.

And against that, rejections were received.

Thank you for sending us "After Making Landfall" for consideration. We appreciate the opportunity to read your work and regret that it does not fit the needs of TriQuarterly. We wish you success in placing it for publication.

Sincerely,

The Editors of TriQuarterly

Thriller Magazine rejected “One Dead Blonde” 

Now, I need do something about getting ready for the group session.

sch