Monday, February 2, 2026

Rejections from the last of January

 No longer feeling like a mucus producing machine, but with goo still lurking in my lungs. I hope this will not mark the high point of my energy for the day.

 1/26

Thank you for your submission, but we don't think this is a good fit for the Against All Odds anthology. 

But feel free to submit for future Ink Alchemy anthologies.

Thank you again, take care.

Keegan Young

Editor at Ink Alchemy Books

1/27

Dear Samuel Hasler,

Thank you for submitting "Agnes." We were glad to have the chance to read your work, but unfortunately we were not able to find a place for it in the New England Review.

It’s an important part of our mission to publish work by new and emerging writers as well as by those who have already earned recognition, so we read each piece with care. Because we are only able to publish a small percentage of the thousands of submissions we read each year, we often have to turn down very accomplished work.

If you haven't already, please consider staying in touch by signing up for occasional emails from NER.

Thanks again for sharing your writing with us.

Sincerely, 

The Editors

New England Review

 

 1/28:

We appreciate the opportunity to read your work, but unfortunately "A Heart’s Judgment Judged" was not a right fit for Hudson Review.

Thank you for trying us.

Sincerely,

The Editors of Hudson Review

***

Thank you very much for sending "Agnes" to Boulevard. Although it was not selected for publication, we're glad you thought of us. Good luck placing this with another magazine.

Sincerely,

The Editors

Boulevard
www.boulevardmagazine.org
 

 

 1/30

Thank you for taking the time to send us your writing and for your patience. We are sorry to report that this story was not selected for publication in our Spring issue. 

We hope TGLR will remain on your radar when you seek publication opportunities in the future, and we wish you the best. 

Sincerely,

Shyla & The Good Life Review Short Fiction Team

 

sch

Friday, January 30, 2026

Eating in Anderson

 I know, dear reader, this will not be of interest to you in China, but maybe my persistent reader from Kokomo will find Food The Absolute Best New Restaurants in Anderson [Updated 2026] (Indiana Insider) has some points to consider.

First, Bonge's is not new - Bonge's has been going strong over 15 years, but it's not in Anderson. 

Second, neither Pendleton nor Chesterfield are Anderson.

Just nitpicking?

Good to see The Pitt is still open. I hope the food remains as good. 

sch 

Monday, January 26, 2026

The Benefits and Costs of Illegal Immigration

 I have been sick these past two days; sick to the point I am not confident of my cogency. A sinus infection that started on Friday and took with a vengeance yesterday. I have slept more than I have been conscious. The last time I was out of the apartment was Saturday before the snow hit, a quick run to Dollar General, The coughing started yesterday, I sounded like an artillery barrage and my chest ached. I went back out today to get meds, and more Coke Zero. This will probably the only post I write today. Which is Monday; I slept so much I have been thinking it was Tuesday.

Onto today's topic; the benefits, first.

We forget what Milton Friedman said about illegal immigration  (The Hill); not that I am a fan of Milton - I find his ideas antagonistic to humanity.

Friedman said illegal immigration was a good thing so long as it is illegal. Illegal immigrants do not qualify for welfare benefits, Social Security, or other myriad benefits American citizens can receive. Illegal immigrants work hard, are good workers, gravitate to jobs, are better off here, and benefit the U.S. and American citizens. Illegal immigrants take jobs most Americans do not want.

But if you make illegal immigration legal, then “it’s no good,” Friedman added.

 The costs:

 Killing of anti-ICE protester exposes rare GOP rift on immigration — even in Florida  

Federal judge slams Iowa ICE agents for unlawful arrest, ‘misleading’ actions  

Immigration agents detain family taking 7-year-old child to Portland hospital  

The Trump administration’s playbook after fatal DHS shootings (NBC News)

Brendan Nyhan, a Dartmouth College professor who focuses on misperceptions, conspiracy theories and political communication, said that the Trump administration’s strategy can work to a point but that it brings risks: The images of Pretti killed by a federal agent could fuel a national backlash.

“It’s possible that’s what this will prove to be,” he said.

In a New York Times/Siena poll conducted after Good’s shooting but before Pretti’s, 61% of respondents said ICE’s tactics had gone too far.

Some Republicans are already speaking out. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., called for an investigation and said in a statement that the “credibility of ICE and DHS are at stake.”

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, a Republican, said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Pretti’s death was causing “deep concerns over federal tactics and accountability.”

“Americans don’t like what they’re seeing right now,” he said.

Trump and his allies have seemed to change their stance however slightly; after Good’s death, both Trump and Vice President JD Vance suggested ICE had made mistakes.

Border Patrol surveillance cameras approved over California city (SFGate)

 Chris Madel drops out of race for GOP nomination for governor, blasts immigration crackdown  

 Madel said in a video posted to X that he’s dropping out, in part, because he can’t stand by the Republican Party’s support of the federal immigration crackdown in Minnesota, where many U.S. citizens walk the streets in fear and carry documentation to prove their citizenship. 

“I cannot support the national Republicans’ stated retribution on the citizens of our state, nor can I count myself a member of a party that would do so,” Madel said, whose defense of a state trooper charged with murder raised his profile in recent years. “Operation Metro Surge has expanded far beyond its stated focus on true public safety threats.” 

His statement underscores the increasing unease Minnesota Republicans — which now includes several swing-district lawmakers — are expressing about the surge of federal officers.

 ‘Moral and Political Debacle’: Right-Wing Media, CEOs Urge Trump to Stop Deadly ICE Crackdown (Common Dreams)

“The Trump administration spin on this simply isn’t believable.”

That’s what the editorial board of the right-wing Wall Street Journal wrote Sunday calling for a “pause” in Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) anti-immigrant blitz following Saturday’s killing of 37-year-old intensive care nurse Alex Petti—who was disarmed before being shot by federal agents in Minneapolis—and top administration officials’ claims that the man who helped save US military veterans’ lives was a “domestic terrorist.”

‘Fucking Insane’: Journalist Finds at Least 2,300 Illegal ICE Detentions Since July   (Common Dreams)

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Calls Trump Officials’ Response to Alex Pretti Killing ‘Flat-Out Insane’    (Common Dreams)

In a filing submitted hours after Pretti’s killing, Ellison and other Minnesota officials asked a federal court to prevent DHS and the Trump Justice Department from concealing or destroying evidence related to the shooting.

“According to reports, federal personnel may have seized cell phones, taken other evidence from the scene, and detained witnesses,” the filing states. “It is unclear whether federal personnel otherwise processed the scene—let alone how carefully. Then just a few hours after the shooting, federal personnel left, allowing the perimeter to collapse and potentially spoiling evidence.”

“From a law enforcement perspective, this is astonishing,” the filing continues. “The federal government’s actions are a sharp departure from normal best practices and procedure, in which every effort is taken to preserve the scene and the evidence it contains... [T]he federal government appears to have taken measures that directly led to the destruction of evidence.”

Senate GOP Plans to Give ICE $10 Billion More as Masked Agents ‘Murder People in Broad Daylight’    (Common Dreams)

An unnamed Senate Republican aide told Punchbowl that “government funding expires at the end of the week, and Republicans are determined to not have another government shutdown. We will move forward as planned and hope Democrats can find a path forward to join us.”

One of the bills up for consideration in the Senate this week would provide $64.4 billion in taxpayer money to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including $10 billion for ICE—an agency that is already more heavily funded than many national militaries. Last summer, congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump approved $170 billion in new funding for immigration enforcement, which ICE has used to massively jack up weapons spending.

Exclusive: Hegseth boosts Minneapolis immigration siege, approving use of military base (San Francisco Chronicle)

In an email obtained by the Chronicle, U.S. Customs and Border Protection asked for space at Fort Snelling, a decommissioned military base in an unincorporated area next to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, to house federal immigration agents, weapons, vehicles and aircraft.

Fort Snelling is already the site of a U.S. Immigrations and Custom Enforcement field office and a DHS immigration enforcement and detention processing center. CBP will use land on a U.S. Army Reserve base there.

“The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) requests support from the Department of War (DoW) to provide existing infrastructure to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a component of DHS, specifically an area for parking approximately 300-500 vehicles and 10 storage trailers, a ready room space for approximal 500-800 CBP personnel, a space to house, maintain and operate five CBP Air Assets, access to a magazine to store munitions, and other necessary facilities to support operations in the Minneapolis, Minnesota metropolitan area,” the email said, using the Trump administration’s name for the Department of Defense.

On Monday morning, Hegseth approved the request, according to correspondence obtained by the Chronicle.

‘Noem’s Impeachment Is the Bare Minimum’: Fury at DHS Chief Grows After Pretti Killing   (Common Dreams)

In a call, Trump told Walz he’d look into reducing the number of federal agents in Minnesota  

In a Truth Social post, Trump said that Walz called him “with the request to work together.” Trump said the call was “very good” and that the two “seemed to be on a similar wavelength.”

Trump also said that he spoke with Walz about his decision to send U.S. border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota to oversee ICE operations, which has led to speculation that Trump has lost confidence in current operations.

“He was happy that Tom Homan was going to Minnesota, and so am I!” Trump wrote in the post.

The call comes amid a two-month siege in federal immigration enforcement activity that Walz has sharply criticized, including in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece published after the call Monday, and two days after federal agents shot and killed 37-year-old Pretti.

Videos from multiple angles of the killing appear to show Pretti disarmed of a gun he never drew before he was shot by federal agents, contradicting the immediate narrative set by senior Trump administration officials that Pretti had posed a clear and present danger. Criticism of Trump’s deployment of over 3,000 federal agents to Minnesota has only grown since then, with some elected Republicans and gun rights groups expressing discomfort with the Trump administration officials placing the blame on Pretti.

A Message from Your Federal Overlords (McSweeney's)

1. What happened was not what happened.
While it may have looked like a shooting, it was actually a “rapid de-escalation outcome.” We recognize that phrases like that may sound invented, which is why we ask you to repeat them anyway.

If you witnessed something disturbing, please understand that witnessing is not evidence. Evidence is what exists after it has been reviewed by the people who require it not to exist.

2. The real problem is your reaction.
We regret to inform you that your anger is trending. This is deeply unhelpful. When the public reacts emotionally to repeated tragedies, it puts pressure on leadership to respond with something other than carefully selected words. We ask that you limit yourself to the approved emotional range: concerned but not furious, shaken but not mobilized, heartbroken but still able to return to normal programming.

3. Words matter, which is why we will choose yours for you.
Certain phrases have become popular among Minneapolis residents, including:

  • “This is unacceptable.”
  • “Why does this keep happening?”
  • “Who is responsible?”

    These phrases are inflammatory because they imply causality. To keep things calm, use safer language, such as:

  • “A misunderstanding.”
  • “A complex situation.”
  • “Questions remain.”
  • “Both sides.”

If you would like to express outrage, consider saying “This is concerning” while staring silently into the distance. This creates the sensation of accountability without the discomfort of actual accountability.

And there is more.


 

 


 


 




 Noem agrees to testify before Senate Judiciary in March   (The Hill)

How is that Obama deported hundred of thousands with killing any citizens? 

sch 

Remembering Midwestern Writers. Charting A Course to the Future?

 I heard of Lingering Inland at I heard about "Lingering Indiana" at Proof: A Midwest Lit Fest - the program put on by Indiana Humanities. I bought the book, and in the past few days ran across a review from The Chicago Sun-Times, A new book makes the case for the Midwest’s literary might

Reflecting on these large-scale demographic changes, Olivarez says in his forward for Lingering Inland, “Because no one is looking to the Midwest for innovation, it has become an excellent place to experiment. The worst has already happened. Our former industries have collapsed or are on life support. What is there to do but dream a new way of living?”

“Lingering Inland” editor Andy Oler says that conception of the future happens when humans connect stories with people and places.

“What this collection is trying to achieve is to take those individual, idiosyncratic stories and start to sort of create a whole mosaic, a much bigger picture of what the region is, of what Chicago is, of like, how we think about the Midwest,” Oler said.

He hopes readers engage with the works slowly, letting the words sit with them. Each essay is around 1,000 words.

“I hope that they don’t read it all at once. I guess maybe, which is maybe a weird thing to say, but the brevity of the essays leads people to, you know, pick up one, read one or two, and put it down and then pick it up again,” Oler said. “I think that it’s something that you can sort of pop in and out of while you’re reading your coffee, while you’re, you know, waiting to leave, like, whatever it is, I think that it’s, it’s a nice little hit, and it, it lets people access it at their own pace.”

The collection is available at University of Illinois Press.

Well, that is what I am doing with the book - nibbling on it. I started with the Indiana writers - Booth Tarkington, Kurt Vonnegut, Michael Martone - and was pleasantly surprised by a non-academic approach. It is very much more oriented to what the Midwestern writer meant to the essayist, not a formal discussion of their literary output.

The choices are varied - Louis L'Amour is here as well as Toni Morrison. Oddly, no Hemingway or Sinclair Lewis or Theodore Dreiser. I don't think of Kentucky (Hunter S. Thompson) as Midwest. 
 
I do suggest buying the book for anyone interested in Midwestern writers, or just writers in general.
 
I make this suggestion not only because it endorses my idea that we out here in the Midwest have a license to experiment.
 
sch 1/24 
 


 

 

Prison Food - What You're Not Eating Tonight

 Since I returned home, people thought being a federal prison meant I was eating well. That's about as funny as people thinking Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution had air conditioning in our cells.

 When I first got to Fort Dix, there were these sausages - think kielbasa - that were pretty good, except for the bone chips that were dangerous to teeth and digestion. They finally got rid of them, probably too expensive.

We had chicken quarters Tuesdays and Thursdays, but they discontinued the quarters for Tuesday after a few years. The chicken tended to often be pink close to the bone. This bothered some people, but I thought it had been steamed enough to be safe. It certainly had killed the taste. Other than the occasional bird with pin feathers intact, it was tolerable. Most people thought they would never eat chicken again. I can tell you chicken tastes nothing on the outside, it has almost wiped away all the bad memories of prison chicken.

 Oddly, one thing they did well was liver and onions. That got ditched after my first year, if my memory is correct.

Eggs were the one thing I despised - I think they had to use liquid eggs or some such substitute. Again, eggs out here taste nothing like they did in prison.

The word was that local restaurants donated food. I think that is how we got turkey burgers. They were a welcome change, until they tasted of freezer burn.

Then there was the time someone stored garlic or onions with the skim milk. Garlic infused milk was served for weeks.

 Anyway, what I read this morning in Food In Federal Prisons Isn't Just Bad, Sometimes It's Dangerous — Here's Why Read More (The Takeout) reminded me of all that.

You'd be naive to think that food in federal or state prison is up to par with a gourmet meal by Bobby Flay. Honestly, you'd be naive to think the food is even slightly enjoyable. Food in prison is used to further punish inmates, lacking both nutrition and basic moral decency. Cell phone images smuggled out of American correctional facilities showcase the food being served in chow halls barely looks edible. This presents a slew of health risks for incarcerated individuals.

In 2020, Impact Justice conducted a study of food in American prisons. The study produced many unfortunate statistics, like 62% of inmates stating they rarely (if ever) were given fresh vegetables and 94% saying they did not receive enough food to feel full. The report additionally found that, on average, American prisons spend $3 per day on food per inmate. The food prisoners did receive was of the poorest quality. A 2021 federal lawsuit from Mississippi alleged food was "spoiled, rotten, molded, or uncooked" and contaminated with rat, bird, and insect feces. Shockingly, formerly incarcerated individuals reported seeing "not for human consumption" labels on food boxes. These boxes contained "chicken" as well as "deli meats" such as bologna, ham, and salami.

I never saw the boxes marked not for human consumption, but I heard of them.

The article mentions the commissary:

Prisoners gather food from the life preserver that is the commissary (aka the canteen). The commissary offers food to prisoners we on the outside would purchase in grocery stores — think ramen, snack cakes, and chips. Because inmates make less than $1 per hour, unless you have support from the outside the commissary is often unattainable. Even if one is able to purchase a pack of ramen noodles, a typical bowl of ramen comes with over 1,500 grams of sodium, which only exacerbates the rampant health issues found in correctional facilities. Nevertheless, the Prison Policy Initiative found that inmates spend $947 per year at the commissary. Prison food suppliers, like Aramark, supply both chow hall food and commissary food across multiple prisons, thus incentivizing the suppliers to drive commissary sales by providing low-quality food elsewhere.

We did not have food from Aramark, but from vendors who marketed to the federal prisons. I have forgotten the names now; it was assumed the vendors were politically connected.

Relying on the commissary was called "eating out of your locker". I did not, but plenty of others did. It was a sign that you had more money than others. The hooch makers, the ones running the gambling, the ones selling tobacco or drugs, the organized crime types did this as well as those with money on the outside, or with friends and family who sent them money. I did not do this. Most of my roommates assigned this to me being crazy. I was not going to let my family and friends subsidize the federal government,

 The article is correct about how little bought at the commissary was healthy.

Unmentioned is how the BOP used commissary to punish unit buildings. 

The article mentions prison cookbooks.

Prison cookbooks have burgeoned from intrigue about prison life. Popular prison cookbooks include Albert "Prodigy" Johnson's "Commissary Kitchen" and Wisconsin Books to Prisoners' "Canteen Cuisine." Although written by different people who shared different experiences behind bars, these books display creativity at its finest and how food persists as a source of light in the darkest of places.

The links in the above paragraph did not translate, so here goes Commissary Kitchen Paperback – October 11, 2016, and What Martha Stewart Thought About The Food In Prison.

There was ingenuity in cooking in prison. The Puerto Ricans made a rice dish in cut down pickle buckets (the buckets stolen from the mess hall) in our unit microwaves. I had pizzas and cakes made the same way. If I recall correctly, Fort Dix let the microwaves breakdown without putting in replacements. This eliminated the cooking in the unit buildings, a source of income for many. By the time COVID shutdown trips to the mess hall, what we were left with was the hot water supply. It was good enough for ramen noodles and coffee.

Some of the bright boys in another unit building thought they could do a hunger strike over conditions Now, the United States Bureau of Prisons has made their operations as secretive as any Soviet Gulag. Maybe more so, no general media outlet takes an interest in the federal prisons. What Fort Dix did was empty the unit building and send them elsewhere. The conditions did not change.

What I noticed was that mess hall depended on it not having to feed all the inmates. Even at the best of times, if your unit was the last to the mess hall (and there was an order in how the units were released to meals), there would be empty pans (of beans, rice, oatmeal - depending on the meal) at the steam tables. Then one month, the prison had banned most units from commissary, then it was closed for inventory. Food service collapsed. The word coming out of prisoners working food service was that the guards running food service begged for commissary to be reopened.

 We also lost a lot of fresh fruit because people were making hooch. Hundred of gallons, in more than one unit building.

Any vegetables were canned, not fresh. And cooked well-nigh to mush.

I close with give you a link to the national menu for the Bureau of Prisons. I will make two notes: 

  1. Not every prison follows this menu
  2. Understand that if you see something like fajitas or having a foreign name, it is not what you think, but it is there to make you think better of what the federal government feeds its inmates.

 I recall the fajitas as mostly onions and green pepper with bits of tough meat; not what you will get at Applebee's. They did a lo mein that was boiled, greasy turkey meat tossed into spaghetti; it would have gotten a good laugh from anyone knowing lo mein.

 The BOP National Menu

I have written far more than I expected. Maybe there is more resentment in me than I have acknowledged, or I am acting out a delusion. What delusion? That any American reading this will care what they are doing to their prison's inmates. You probably think we deserved to be treated this way. However, answer this: what do you get if you treat people like animals instead of human beings?

sch 1/24 

 

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Two For Writers (One for Philosophers)

 I am amused by those who do not know me, but wish to put me into some ideological straight jacket. To myself, I am a conservative pragmatist. If you want to understand my politics, I have two suggestions.

First, listen to The Kinks' The Village Green Preservation Society

Second, consider John Stuart Mill's essay on Coleridge:

But I must close this long essay—long in itself though shortin its relation to its subject and to the multitude of topics involved in it. I do not claim to have given a sufficient account of Coleridge; but I hope I have proved to some who were not before aware of it that in him and in the school to which he belongs there is something that they would do well to know more about. I may have done something to show that a Tory philosopher cannot be wholly a Tory, but must often be a better Liberal than Liberals themselves; while he is the natural means of rescuing from oblivion truths that Tories have forgotten and the prevailing schools of Liberalism never knew. 

(Searching for that quote turned up Mill on Coleridge from Harper's Magazine, and this passage:

For Mill, the liberal is hard to imagine without the conservative, the two are an inevitable pairing, living in a sort of political symbiosis. Liberalism seeks inevitably to define itself through an interaction with conservative thought; that process is in fact essential to understanding it. ) 

Here is my conservatism showing -

 Guarding the Gates of Our Language (Quillette)

When it first appeared in 1926, Modern English Usage was celebrated as an essential guide, but also a terror. Every writer feels a sense of alarm on reading the book, as one reviewer noted: “His previous light-hearted impulses, in selecting his vocabulary, wilt under the searchlight that Mr. Fowler’s articles turn on his usage.” Indeed, the joke goes that Fowler’s main contribution was to rid the world of bad writers by shaming them into silence. The London Times wrote a wounded editorial warning that the book would cause the average writer to suffer a crisis of confidence. “He is like the centipede in the poem, which lost the power of walking as soon as the frog asked him which leg he moved first.” 

*** 

Perhaps sensing the winds of reaction, Oxford University Press re-issued the original in 2010, with an introductory essay by a professor from Bangor who celebrates its wonders despite its inconsistencies. Do we detect in this reissue a return to cultural gatekeeping, or at least a recognition that the English language, the culture of the English-speaking peoples who invented it, is not some open source code for the world’s “diverse” peoples to ransack but a precious inheritance whose preservation requires more, not less, effort because of its success?

The rub, of course, is that we can no longer consult “the conversational usage of educated people” as a guide to our cultural patrimony because that cohort has now become the problem not the solution. The US-based Conference on College Composition and Communication issued a denunciation in 2021 of what it called “White Language Supremacy,” calling standard English a tool to oppress those “whose dynamic language practices do not fit monolingual white ideologies.” Many educated people today would have us all sounding like a cross between an HR manual and Kamala Harris. All the more reason, then, to revive a determined, punctilious, and judgmental culture of correct English among those interested in cultural preservation. The point of gates, after all, is not just what they keep out but what they enclose within.

 Prose serves to communicate. Formal prose has its rules so that we can communicate to all English-speakers. What I would do in formal prose, or even in narrative prose, is different from what I would do in dialog. KH wants me to use more contractions, and I do except when I want to make out a formal speaker - while also trying not to drop into dialect. The only writer I know who writes dialect in a way that is readable without denigrating the speaker is Zora Neale Hurston. She was an anthropologist; I am not. She is a great writer; I am not.

 Why Writers Need a Sense of Wonder in Fiction More Than Ever (KM Weiland)

We live in a storytelling moment deeply fascinated by darkness—and for good reason. Stories have always descended into shadow to help us metabolize our fear, trauma, and moral failure. They name the monster, bringing it out of the shadows where it can be faced and perhaps integrated or understood. But stories don’t just explore darkness; they also orient us within it as part of a larger narrative. This is why writers need to continue exploring a sense of wonder in fiction more than ever—not as escape or denial, but as a way of completing the arc. Wonder, hope, and other life-affirming paradigms are what allow stories to move through the descent rather than getting stuck there, which in turn shapes how both individuals and cultures imagine whether the journey is ultimately worth it.

sch 1/23 

 

Saturday, January 24, 2026

Lingering Political Topics

 Trying to get caught up - I have been trying to delete most of my political related emails so I can concentrate on my novel. Please excuse the brevity of this post - the last one ought to be long enough!

sch 1/23

Bari Weiss suuuuuuuuuuuuucks (SFGate)

Horribly. Now we’re getting to the stuff you’ve probably read about. Weiss personally spiked that initial “60 Minutes” report because, the “additional reporting” she wanted in the original piece was comment (a rebuttal, really) from the Trump administration, which that administration repeatedly refused to provide despite CBS’ initial outreach. The report finally aired recently with a handful of extra details on the prisoners’ criminal records, numbers provided by — QUELLE SURPRISE — Trump’s people

Philadelphia sues over removal of slavery exhibit at Independence National Historical Park  (SFGate)

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Outraged critics accused President Donald Trump of “whitewashing history” on Friday after the National Park Service removed an exhibit on slavery at Philadelphia's Independence National Historical Park in response to his executive order “restoring truth and sanity to American history” at the nation's museums, parks and landmarks.

Empty bolt holes and shadows are all that remains on the brick walls where explanatory panels were displayed at the President’s House Site, where George and Martha Washington lived with the people they owned as property when Philadelphia was the nation's capital. One woman cried silently at their absence. Someone left a bouquet of flowers. A hand-lettered sign said “Slavery was real.”

Workers on Thursday removed the exhibit, which included biographical details about the nine people enslaved by the Washingtons at the presidential mansion. Just their names — Austin, Paris, Hercules, Christopher Sheels, Richmond, Giles, Oney Judge, Moll and Joe — remain engraved into a cement wall.

Seeking to stop the display's permanent removal, the city of Philadelphia on Thursday sued Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and acting National Park Service Director Jessica Bowron.

The Unbanned Book Network is a new initiative fighting for diverse books in the classroom. (Literary Hub)

A new program called The Unbanned Book Network is stepping in to counter the increased threat of book bans in schools across America. The new initiative was launched this week by the team at We Need Diverse Books, and aims to build partnerships between schools and teachers to improve literacy, support diverse authors and books that have been targeted by book banners, and create a nationwide community of teachers and students.

“We’re not only facing an ongoing literacy crisis in the U.S., we’re also battling increased rates of censorship, which is infringing on our students’ right to read,” Dhonielle Clayton, the CEO of We Need Diverse Books said in the AP.