I got behind on my session notes, the last I can find is from 1/2/2026, and so let's go.
1/9:
Faith
What? Where? When? Who? Why? Experience - Reason - Fath- Skepticism.
- Who gets me there?
- Doubt leads to wisdom.
Plato = wisdom
Aristotle= experience
(No idea of history.)
Hume to Descartes.
(I know that is backwards, just as I know Descartes was all rationality - “I think, therefore I am” - and Hume was more empirical. But I say nothing. Pulling him up is not really relevant to the day's dissertation. Pedantry will muddy things.)
Emotions: postmodern empiricism
Kant: pragmatic.
(I have no idea what was meant by “postmodern empiricism” since I was probably shocked by labeling Kant as pragmatic.)
Kirkegard = existentialism, leap of faith.
scientism - confined to non-history and meaning impossible.
(does he not mean presentism?)
Materialism - probabilism. What? Where?
1940s - measurement problems.
Framing problems.
Cognitive disorders -
- Harmful thinking error
- Without good purpose
Therapy prioritizes long term.
sch 5/25: scientism & presentism. Well, learning something new every day means you're not dead!
Probabilism - can go for that; in fact, I am pretty sure it is how I live, and I think everyone else does - we have to go with what is likely because we cannot know the future with any certainty. Materialism is more attractive to me; I distrust idealism, it is the philosophy of too many mass murderers. I do not understand how they were supposed to be connected and I am even less certain now.
1/16
Thought begins [with] Law of Comparison
- Figure/ground - must have boundaries
- Schemas
- Emotional reasoning (I feel it is true.)
- Negative filtering
(Nothing is neutral.)
Complies all your experiences.
1/23:
1/30: no notes.Emotional reasoning - negative filters
Tribalism
Language
Polarized thinking
- Overgeneralization
- Global labelling
sch 5/25
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment