I made an appointment with Middletown Properties to look at apartments this afternoon. So far, no text confirmation, and no application in the email. I have my doubts it will happen. My status is the root of my doubts. We will see.
Meanwhile, I finished reading The Guardian's The social housing secret: how Vienna became the world’s most livable city. Seeing the homelss here in Middletown, USA, and hearing about even worse problems elsewhere, this seems like a good idea.
Part of the reason Schranz’s apartment is so affordable is simple: it’s owned by the city. In Vienna, that is (almost) the norm. The landlord of approximately 220,000 socially rented apartments, it is the largest home-owning city in Europe (in London, which has more than 800,000 socially rented apartments, they are owned by the local councils). A quarter of the people who live in Vienna are social tenants – if you also include the approximately 200,000 co-operative dwellings built with municipal subsidies, it’s more than half the population.
Many of these apartments came into being a century ago, as part of an enormously ambitious building programme after the end of the first world war, when Vienna was awash with people uprooted by the collapse of the Habsburg empire. Funded primarily through a hypothecated tax on luxuries such as champagne or horse-riding, the inaugural phase of socialist-governed “Red Vienna” saw 65,000 socially rented apartments shoot up within the city by the time of the Nazi coup attempt in 1934.
But here is why I do not think it will work here:
The Viennese term for estates like these is Gemeindebauten, “communal buildings”, which hints at their underlying philosophy. “One of the key concepts to understanding Vienna’s approach to housing is social sustainability,” says Maik Novotny, an architecture critic for the Austrian newspaper Der Standard. “In order to avoid the creation of ghettoes and the costly social conflicts that come with them, the city actively strives for a mixing of people from different backgrounds and on different incomes in the same estates. Social housing isn’t just for the poor.”
As a student without a disability or any dependants, Schranz would have no hope of applying for social housing in countries such as the UK, but in Vienna the city courted him via a programme for first-time tenants under 30.
This Christian nation has no use for charity. It prefers to segregate its citizens. NIMBY surpasses social anything, let alone social housing. Too bad, we might do it better than he Austrians.
sch 6:08 AM
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment