Sunday, April 28, 2024

Even The Greatest Writers Have Their Troubles

 I am trying to get caught up with the blog, having spent too much time on family legal issues. All I have been able to do since stopping work on "Love Stinks" is a short play (which needs revision!)

Irish Murdoch is a writer I have read much about but have not been able to find the time to read myself. The Paris Review opened its paywall for their interview of Murdoch, Iris Murdoch, The Art of Fiction No. 117. Out of that interview, this jumped up out at me - that genius ahs the same problems as an old dullard like me:

MURDOCH

Yes, I do enjoy it, but it has, of course—I mean, this is true of any art form—moments when you think it’s awful, you lose confidence and it’s all black. You can’t think and so on. So, it’s not all enjoyment. But I don’t actually find writing in itself difficult. The creation of the story is the agonizing part. You have the extraordinary experience when you begin a novel that you are now in a state of unlimited freedom, and this is alarming. Every choice you make will exclude another choice, so that it’s rather important what happens then, what state of mind you’re in and what you think matters. Books should have themes. I choose titles carefully and the titles in some way indicate something deep in the theme of the book. Names are important. The names sometimes don’t come at once, but the physical being and the mind of the character have to come pretty early on and you just have to wait for the gods to offer you something. You have to spend a lot of time looking out of the window and writing down scrappy notes that may or may not help. You have to wait patiently until you feel that you’re getting the thing right—who the people are, what it’s all about, how it moves. I may take a long time, say a year, just sitting and fishing around, putting the thing into some sort of shape. Then I do a very detailed synopsis of every chapter, every conversation, everything that happens. That would be another operation. 

***

MURDOCH

It’s the one I mentioned earlier, the beginning, how to start and when to begin structuring the novel. It is this progression from complete freedom to a narrow cage, how fast you move and when you decide what the main things in the book are going to be. I think these are the most difficult things. One must consider what one’s characters are like, what jobs they do, what religion they have, what nationality they are, how they are related to each other, and so on. Here at the beginning one has infinite possibilities, this choice of what sort of people they are and what sort of troubles they are going to have, who wins, who loses, who dies. Most of all one must reflect upon their values, their morality, their moral dilemmas. You can’t write any novel without implying values. You can’t write a traditional novel without giving your characters moral problems and judgments. That is what is most difficult of all.  

What I learned on my own these past 13 years, is that writing is work. That I read Iris Murdoch as endorsing that Keep faith with yourself, keep working, keep trying to do better, and do not wait 40 years to take a chance.

Good luck! 

Lent Almost Over and I'm Not Sure About The Lesson Learned

One more week of Lent. The dissension along the family's fault lines disturbed my Lent. Angry when I am supposed to be contemplating spiritual matters. I broke fast last week, being out more than home.

I am not sure what got me sick on Friday. I think it was salami eaten on Thursday night. My insides were cramping until Saturday. How do women survive days and days of cramps?

Here is one way to lose weight: have your insides cramping so much that you do not want to eat. On the other hand, it did help with the Lenten fast!

I have almost everything ready to go on the trust case - I will be uploading most of it shortly. That has occupied my time for the past few days - when I was not in the bathroom, that is. Legal work, laundry, and church were all I accomplished this week.

I have found that the Ball State Student Center also has wi-fi. It's advantages are that food is closer and it may be a little closer to home. Disadvantages - there are too many students! They occupy spaces where I could set up this laptop. Graduation is next week.


sch

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Love Needed

I keep getting distracted from today's goals, I think maybe there is something to be learned from these digressions. I know what it was like to have purpose without meaning.

Here is the latest, from Aeon Weekly: The enchanted vision.

Put another way, love was considered a universal force and a matter for knowledge, integral to the warp and weft of reality, not just a beneficent feeling or costly duty, practised at a personal level in acts of compassion or charity. When someone received love or gave it, they aligned themselves with the fundamental vitality pulsing through them and everything else. Sun and moon, mountains and seas, plants and birds, beasts of water and land. Everything participated in a common movement of love that would eventually return them to their source and sustainer.

Human beings could intentionally attend to this dynamic and collaborate with it. But, if not, if love is demoted from this role it becomes, at best, a moral ideal or emotion, exapted from evolution and sustained by the brain. Metaphysical agnosticism has replaced ‘ontological rootedness’, to borrow from the philosopher Simon May. Little wonder people feel disorientated or worse. To misquote R D Laing: someone who describes love as an epiphenomenon might be a great scientist, but someone who lives as if love is so will need a good psychiatrist.

But might the older notion of love be returning, as Weil and others have hoped? Might we be moving past the Romantics, who strove to comfort modern minds disturbed by what William Wordsworth called the ‘still, sad music of humanity’ because we are coming to know once more of that ‘holier love’? Might love be not just all you need, but something precisely required to account for who we are and all that is?

Yeah, here I am in the middle of Lent with my bad temper aroused and this is a reminder of what is feeding my anger: being dragged down to the level of those who suckle on the bitterness of hate.

sch 

Monday, April 22, 2024

Bo Diddley Is Loose

 Just a little bit of fun I started months ago and now don't have the time to finish.p














sch

Sunday, April 21, 2024

Having Survived Kokomo and The White Trash Diva

 I played lawyer for the very last time in my life this past Wednesday. It had to do with my trust. For three years, I have been trying to get a fix on assets and values. I go that much.

I filed a complaint before the hearing in two different courts. There is something on electronic filing service that I have not looked at. That is for tomorrow.

Neither of my sisters knew what was in the trust. No one had received any information from the trustee.

The taxi got me there hours early. So early, I needed more calories. I found a place called MoJoes on the east side of the courthouse. My Lenten fast got broken there. Another annoyance for me, along with the $140 it took me to get there.

My youngest sister had no great concern about any of this. Yet, she showed up at the hearing on Wednesday. She did not speak to me. Her attentions were focused solely on my step-sister.

I left with some clarity on the trust, and I got more on my relatives. I was wrong about the issue of stacks, but then, too, I think the Trustee's pleading might have been clearer. (An aside: no one has written anything in this case as clearly as I would have - a sign I interpret as hiding by indirection.)

Sitting at the northeast corner of the courthouse square, smoking a cigarette, I noticed she came out of the courthouse with her daughter. I did not see her walk past, only my niece. Then I realized my sister was hiding from me. She constitutes too large an object for easy concealment.

I got up to speak to her. She began walking away. Her daughter - middle 30s - came raging, yelling from a good twenty feet away that I was not to speak to her mother. She added that I had disrespected my father and my stepmother (she said her grandmother, but my mother was dead long before she was born, so I will assume my stepmother.) The fatal flaw in her hectoring was I could hear her without making out her words. All I had said to my sister was she needed to visit her cousin.

My niece's performance led me to think of her now as the white trash diva. All emotion, not much sense. Much righteousness about matters beyond her understanding, or responsibility.

It has been long decades since anyone has called me self-righteous. I think it was around Fourth Grade when I repeated some derogatory words of my mother's mother about neighbor children in my mother's presence. She gave me a thorough dressing down. More importantly, she got me thinking.

Later in life, I had a high school teacher I respected tell me not to think I knew everything, and met Socrates. It is learning how much we do not know that marks an education. Some of my other teachers - Thoreau, Nietzsche, Emerson, William James, John Stuart Mill, Sir Francis Bacon, and David Hume - made the same points. Church had its part to play there, too.

Family members have called me arrogant. I realized this past Wednesday, it is that I do not accept their moral superiority and the judgments that flow from that superiority. Bumptious and impatient is how I think of myself - when I am not calling myself a moron.

I remember the pursed lips, the inability to look in my direction, or having the courtesy of speaking to me of not only my blood kin but the relations brought into my life by my father's marriage. It is the same look of sanctity that has been passed down from the ages. I do not wish to sound like a misogynist, but it is one that I have seen more common among women than men. Maybe they get it from the movies - what I saw in the Howard County Courthouse resembled the scene in Stagecoach where the local purity squad is driving Claire Trevor out of town. They all shared a moral superiority over me. They all looked unhappy, and they gave off the impression of all having been weaned on pickles, which seems to me to have justified with hunts and lynchings. They are the pure, the righteous. In other places and times, they have sewn swastikas onto uniforms and collected stones for the village stoning, and gathered faggots for the heretics' barbeque.

My temper flared but remained under control. However, it did not go out. What happened is it exhausted me. I did not sleep well for two nights. The behavior that I found so rancid from my own relatives brought me closer to an episode of depression than I have had since 2010 or 2009. That I was exhausted by the end of the whole episode weakened my control is what brought me close to a crisis. I am glad I am taking my Zoloft.

The episode raises also questions of nature versus nurture. Everything I can tell of my son who was adopted is that he is a well-adjusted family man with a stable job and marriage; no signs of a need for performative vile behavior. None of that can be said of my youngest sister's children. I feel more and more that I saved the boy from life soiled by my sister's behavior. 

It also gives me ideas on how some in the wider world think think. Not that I know my sister's politics. I suspect they are whatever her friends think is proper without any reflection on her part as to the wisdom or utility of those views. I used rancid above because that is what I think all self-righteous ends. In the end, self-righteousness can only destroy what it thinks is inferior: Jews for Nazis; Native Americans for George Armstrong Custer; African-Americans for the KKK; Dalits for Brahmins; and the list goes back to the beginning of history. They want that destruction even if they have lived lives of parasites, have had no ambition other than feeding their faces, and have contributed nothing constructive to their societies.

Saturday morning I listened to NPR's On The Media's  LISTEN Meet the Media Prophets Who Preach Christian Supremacy. Plus, Journalism in ‘Civil War’. As an Orthodox Christian, I find nothing Christian about this kind of thinking. I would have thought the same during the decades I remained aloof from the church. Christianity is not about political or religious supremacy. It is about imitating Christ's humility.

For our pride to admit that we are worse and more insignificant than others means committing suicide. Therefore it does not allow us to tell the truth about ourselves. It continually keeps us in our self-delusion, forcing us to give our qualities a higher mark. Who of us can say with all our hearts these words: “I am nothing; I am the worst, the least of all”? Very few, although one may be the worst criminal. And this means that humility, humility of wisdom is as far from us as the earth is from the heavens.

If we wish to be true Christians, then we should try with all our strength to rouse in ourselves the spirit of Christian humility and the striving to serve others. In order for us to love humility and not think that it can degrade us but to the contrary, understand that it serves for our exaltation, we should always remember that pride is hateful to both the Lord and our neighbor, while humility attracts the good will of both God and man, and the Lord has forthrightly promised a reward for it.

The podcast above makes a point of the dangers Christian nationalism poses for the country and for our democracy. They fear the loss of their power as a supposed majority. The "supposed" is mine. I do not think they represent the majority of Christians, I do not think they represent Christian theology. They are the small-minded; because the small-minded are easily frightened and cling hard to their supposed prerogatives. They are the ones who shroud themselves in the cloak of their self-righteousness. Those proud of their righteousness deem the rest of humanity expendable. They have done that from the death of the first person they cast out as a heretic.

Strange to think I have a relative like that. Is the difference just education? Or is it that I selected from a different view? Or is it our interpretation of the same data that differs?

From a practical standpoint, I am not sure that the familial issues are all that important. Once this trust business is over, our twain shall never meet again. A failure for both of our parents, but not one I care any longer to mend. My own concern is far more personal - am I forgiving trespasses, and does forgiving trespasses require me to embrace what I find antithetical to a healthy remainder of my life?

The greater danger is to what extent these self-righteous types, with their faith in having God (or whatever be their source of morality) on their side, certain in all their judgments endanger the lives of others. These are people of Margaret Atwood's Gilead; of Robert Heinlein's "If This Goes On—"; the people who built Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago; the people who gave smallpox-laden blankets to the Native Americans.

I have seen enough vileness in my life. Participated in too much, too. At my most nihilistic, I believed there was nothing that could be done. I think now the self-righteous are too destructive to humanity, and we must resist those who would destroy the world to justify their own existence, who would level us all down to their level of joylessness. Whether there is a future for our species may be an open question, but the time remaining for humanity can be better spent than living under the dictatorship of those who fear looking up from the mud to see the stars.

I spent the rest of my time in Kokomo at their public library. It is a nice place, but I thought it was small compared to Anderson's. I had problems with keeping their wi-fi connection open, and I had trouble with my cell phone. This left me without much in the way of communications, and an uncertainty on how to get back home. I kept feeling more and more exhausted. Finally, I got through on the phone to a taxi company.

Walking out, I noticed a vending machine at the entrance. Not sure what I was seeing, I stopped for a closer look. It was for possible drug overdoses. 

I keep asking this - why is it we do not ask why we have a market for illicit drugs? We blame the dealer, but the dealer is only providing what the market desires. What is it about our society that so many people need the protection and solace of a chemical blanket? We have been too self-righteous to ask that question.

The taxi driver and I talked the way to Muncie - food and electric cars and the life in Kokomo. He got me back here around 6:30. It cost me $120.00.

I was in bed by 7 pm. Tired, but sleep did not come for hours. 

At least, I can say I knew more than I did about the trust business than I did on Tuesday. Then, too, I survived my niece, the white trash diva.

On the other hand, it has taken me 4 days to write this report.

sch 4/21




Saturday, April 20, 2024

Digressions, Detours, Wasted Time?

 I need to write one thing this day, and I need to do laundry and get a better grip on the email.

Those are the day's goals. These have been the detours.

DYING CITIES: ON THE LONE BOOK OF 'LOST' NOVELIST ELAINE PERRY

Perry is a wonderful stylist, a vivid writer whose prose unspools like a European art film inspired by American pulp fiction with a soundtrack by Tricky working with the Berliner Philharmoniker. The respected Poets & Writers journal called the book “tragic and haunting…exceptional (and) daring,” Another Present Era is also one of more ambitious novels of that decade. Perry writes in a maximalist style that hasn’t been in vogue in years. I enjoy texts that are overflowing with ideas on culture and sex, angst filled meditations and doomed people trying to escape the dark cloud that looms over their heads until their last breath. 

After reading Another Present Era, which by today’s standards would be labeled Afrofuturism (standing proudly next to Dhalgren and Kindred) I wanted more of Elaine Perry’s words, but there wasn’t any. “It was Perry’s only novel, which is a bit of a mystery, given her talent,” Bridgett Davis wrote in her note. Indeed, it was mysterious, but a few of my favorite creative visionaries created singular works of greatness (Ephraim Lewis/Skin, Charles Laughton/The Night of the Hunter) that will be remembered by a small group of people for years to come. 

“MY MIND HAD BEEN FIRED BY READING CHEAP DETECTIVE STORIES"

Another reminder of books I have not read: Sterne as influencer.

What kind of writer am I, are you? Forget That Stuff about Mounties, Hockey, and Corny Beer Commercials raises points that apply outside of Canada:

As the nation, so the novel, you would think. There’s no longer an essence or a trait that defines a Canadian novel. And yet some novels are regarded more Canadian than others, which are welcomed into the pantheon more like foreign guests. It is still possible to be told: When will you write a novel about Canada? Or: This novel is your most Canadian. Or even to be asked, point-blank: Do you consider yourself a Canadian? Painful questions for the author but honestly meant, asked by “real” Canadians. I’ve encountered all three during my tours. Not long ago, a few literary critics, anxious to defend the purity of Canada’s national literature, came out with their calipers to adjudge the Canadianness of foreign-born authors like me who had arrived recently in large numbers and wrote about elsewhere and were receiving attention in the metropolises. And had the temerity to win prizes as Canadian authors. However, the question I have posed—Am I a Canadian writer?—is not my plea for inclusion. I ask it of myself.

I think this paragraph needs thought over by Canadians, Americans, whoever is to be the writer:

For me to go on writing, it should not matter how I am viewed. I cannot pick up the pen or laptop, I cannot honestly call myself a writer of fiction, if I consciously strive to demonstrate in my writing my credentials as a Canadian or African, a Muslim, Hindu, or Sikh, or anything in particular. Others can use labels to describe writers such as I am for their own purposes, but I cannot work under the shadow of a label. It would make me want to scream for my freedom.  
The whole deserves reading from wherever you read this,

I now wait for the bus to take me back, to get back on track with the laundry. I have not yet written the post that needs to be written. Nor have I gotten to the law stuff on email. I will be back here at the Ball State Students Center again today.

 Ian Hunter has a new album out. To me, it sounds great for all I hear his age.



Old News, New Stuff

I still feel the effects of Wednesday. Worn out enough that I would have stayed in bed for the past three days. It was a struggle getting up this morning and I slept like 8 hours. This has been the closest to a serious relapse of my depression that has occurred since 2010. Prison was such a shelter from the strains stress generated by family.

I came over to Bracken Library last night - too tired after work on Thursday. All I managed to do after work was get downtown to AppeThai. Great food. When I was done, I felt more like staying home. I was probably down by 7 pm.

My oldest sister called me and I called her back. I still have not gotten the Gabb phone fixed. On the plans for today. I went for dinner at Chava's without getting through all my emails and when the bus came by going north, I decided I was too tired to want to be walking home at 9 pm or after. Staying awake that late was also an open question.

I got up slowly at 5 pm and crawled out of bed in 30 minutes. No pop, so I walked down to the Village Pantry. I showered after getting my dose of caffeine and sugar. Bracken Library opened at 7 am, so I turned off NPR and decided to hoof it over to BSU. I did stop at Jack's Donuts - more sugar. When I got to the library, it was closed. It does into open until 9 am on Saturdays. Well, that allows for recovery from hangovers. 

Faced with the question of going back to the apartment to gather my laundry, or just hanging around for a a half hour, I decided to check out the student union (what was the Tally Ho 40 years ago). Turns out the wi-fi also operates here. There is also food handy.

This headline came through the email: The closure of the historic Mark III Tap Room impacts Muncie’s LGBTQ+ community. Hard to believe, Forty  years ago, I would drive past the Mark heading from work at The Island and the place was packed. When I heard Muncie had a gay bar, I did not believe it did. That was closer to 44 years ago. Now, it is hard believing it is going away. It did figure in a practical joke I played on KH that I will not repeat here.

However, after a pipe burst in its 306 South Walnut Street location in January 2024, the Mark III Tap Room faced water damage, leading to its closure for the foreseeable future. Access to the bar's resources, performances and community outreach have been lost.

Strange how many bars Muncie has lost since 2010. Changing demographics or worsening economics or Covid.

Good Lord, it is more like a mass migration! Close the doors! It is in the forties today.

And now at 10:40, I look up to see an invading army. Some sort of sales trip for potential students? I see one Anderson H.S. jacket passing me by. There is a booth to my left and a Starbucks to my left.

The Self-Immolation of the AZ GOP (the old news)

Delaware County will need better Italian restaurants: Delaware County to Welcome Three Italian Companies. Anyone reading this blog from Madison County and wondering what is now the difference between Muncie and Anderson should read this article. Imagination is one factor.

I am going to take a chance and leave here for a second.

sch